Skip to main content

NUMBERS' PLANE

Search This Blog

Decomposition of the Möbius function - the key to proving the truth of RH?

Autor: Marcin Leśniak w dniu November 29, 2021

Introduction of the notions of the relative Möbius and Mertens functions as a key for proving RH.

Below you can find the link to the paper being the sketch of such proof.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

What the NUMBERS' PLANE is?

It's the most natural, geometric representation of the numbers treated as the complex objects. In contrast to the plane of complex numbers, where a number is represented as a single point, here each number n is represented by n points (unities) distributed equally on a circle of radius n. Such arrangement of the numbers (their unities) on the plane allows immediately to naturally decode their most important feature - DIVISIBILITY. Every number has its own unique PATTERN OF DIVISIBILITY showing how the given number is divisible by all the other numbers smaller than itself. Red unities are these, which are relatively prime to all the other unities belonging to numbers smaller than n. Patterns of divisibility in a linear form: Quantities of relatively prime unities within given number represent naturally the value of the Euler's Phi(n) function , and here, apart from the value itself, we also have its geometric representation. What is extremely

Möbius and Riemann Zeta functions – their most natural explanation

Möbius function, although being one of the fundamental ones in number theory seems to be purely theoretical one, with no reflection in “reality”. But there exists its very clear and also the most natural representation – Möbius function describes the positions of the relatively prime unities on the NumbersPlane . A detailed explanation of the idea of the Numbers Plane (the most natural representation of the numbers) can be found here , and in the video linked there . Let’s take as an example the number 6 and its representation (including its pattern of divisibility – red unities are relatively prime, and the blue ones are the not relatively prime) on the Numbers Plane. When we sum up the coordinates of all the unities representing given number on the Numbers Plane they naturally always (for every number n) sum up to 0 (both X and Y coordinate). But when we sum up coordinates of only the relatively prime unities , then we are always getting the value (it’s th

On the density of Euler’s Phi function of the sets of numbers in form of p+/-n and their relation to Artin’s constant

It’s well known that the average density of Euler’s Phi (totient) function (stated as Phi(n)/n ) within all the natural numbers, or their long enough subset (including randomly chosen) is equal to We can wonder then what are the average densities of Phi of some specific subsets of the Natural numbers. Creating such a subset starting from some number m and including into it every n th number (so for example starting from 5 and taking every 3 rd one: 5, 8, 11, 14…) makes the case trivial – as expected such average density (let’s call it D(S)) is simply dependent on the divisors of m and n (arranged in a simple formula and multiplied by the 1/Zeta(2) ), so it’s not worthy of being considered here. That’s why the average density of Phi of even numbers is equal to and odds is equal to It's also obvious that the density of the set consisting of only primes naturally tends to 1 when the size of the set tends to infinity, since the Phi(p) = p -1 But the case becomes less tri

Powered by Blogger

Marcin Leśniak